really is a problem that those with decision-making on issues relevant drag an imaginary world of children as ego. I tell them: to the very limit Libya's situation could be brought into play hundreds of options and solutions. Why are our leaders choose war? It is curious that the core of power in Europe is decided by the armed attack on Libya. Frau Merkel only (what a coincidence) has refused to this cruel stupidity. Others, like us, wants to show that 'he' is in that núcleo duro y que no es un 'mariquita' político.
Como los chicos siempre han jugado a ver quién 'la tiene más larga' o a quién es el que 'm.. más lejos', pues ya de mayores ¡y con poder! se lanzan con fruición a jugar a lo mismo. Es como si hubieran estado esperando a que Gadafi les diera un motivo para jugar a su juego preferido: la guerra. Sí, nada de misiones humanitarias ni zarandajas: la guerra armada. ¿La justificación legal? Que Naciones Unidas ha dado el permiso. ¡Qué hipocresía! ¿No saben que lo legal no tiene nada que ver con lo legítimo? Es intolerable. Se me puso la carne de gallina cuando escuché a Z decir: “Por lo tanto, DISPONGO...” ¿Dispongo? But is that a president can have the lives of citizens here and there? I think it's time to question this Western democracy. The end of the Tyrannosaurus will not affect just north of Africa.
This 'intervention' (another euphemism) only due to a whim, a tantrum or a stupid immature ego. All candidates for presidents or ministers should undergo a psychiatric review in depth. They are so ingrained that the war, which together with the domination of the Earth and the subjugation of women constitute the three pillars of patriarchy, the truth is that excites them, they have fun: I do not doubt. If not already would have intervened much earlier compared to other monsters who drown their people alive, as Obiang, for example, they have gone to pay tribute a few days ago with Bono Parliament commissioners at the front. And if you feel like testosterone-driven action, why not send whole armies to rebuild Haiti, for example? Or to save lives in Japan? Or to get drinking water for millions of human beings?
And this barbarity in the plan have called it poetic Odyssey at dawn. The Odyssey is an adventure book in absolute war. Do not you be confused with the Iliad? The Iliad relates to the war against Troy, also motivated by a desire for macho: revenge Helena horns of Menelaus put to Paris. There were all, as now: mirmitones Achilles and Agamemnon, Odysseus, Menelaus of Sparta ... in order. But if the horns were the excuse, the real motive was to seize the territories of the coast of Asia Minor and dominate the strait through which he traveled around the Mediterranean trade. Did not something similar happen now? Oil remains the preferred prey, as seen in Iraq. Someone
Chacon said would be the next candidate. For me and many have already burned. The poor thing has not said a peep. Only 'Yes, Bwana,' which is all I can say women in government to the will embracing the who owe their political rise. What a odyssey!
0 comments:
Post a Comment