a couple of days ago some young students were in Parliament to read the articles of the Constitution . Two of them, bad boys and rebels, they came to add a comment on what they had read and both were reprimanded by the table, besides cutting off the microphone. Wow, man! Well, we're good. That both the Constitution and Parliament are two emblems of what democracy means , Which should be quite compatible with the freedom of opinion and expression, but no. What if all hiciran your comment? Well, we should congratulate ourselves for our youth manifest a high critical awareness and a healthy political education. Or, what good education citizenship? As for anything, or if, to be challenged by parents who want no part of citizenship and a lot of command and control.
I understand: it is precisely in Parliament are not used to anyone saying what he thinks, but a voice in what they send their respective parties. And the rest ... Shut up and vote! Go parliamentarism. Spokesmen for any case are the most pathetic of all, the closest thing to puppet dolls with the script well learned. Like them / they are very happy / as to leave every day on TV, but every day is the same as newsprint, the same gestures, the same voice, same tone, the same spiel and the same monotonous repetition of 'the master's voice '
propose that in successive years, each reader of a particular article make your comment, and so we would go get used to the Parliament is an agora to parley. If our parliaments and parliamentarians is not us represent .... is that citizenship has nothing to say. Why so much expense? That we are in crisis, hear!
0 comments:
Post a Comment